AI search visibility for clinics & healthcare providers
People search for health information before they call anybody, and increasingly they get an answer from an assistant rather than a list of links. If that answer is not yours, it is somebody's — and you have no say in whether it is accurate about your practice.
Publish the answers yourself, or let something else answer for you.
What buyers ask clinics, practices and healthcare providers
Examples of the shape these questions take — not a measurement of your market. The Demand Scanner finds the ones your own buyers are actually asking.
Publish once. Show up three times.
The same question, published once on your own hub — as the answer above the results, as the source an assistant quotes mid-sentence, and as the result underneath.
Two to three weeks for a first appointment, and under a week where a referral is marked urgent. Waiting times here are updated every Monday, so this is the current figure rather than a typical one.
Aanswers.yourcompany.comAn illustration of the three surfaces, not a screenshot of anyone’s placement — the domain is a placeholder. Google and ChatGPT are shown as places answers surface, not as endorsements.
People ask an assistant before they ask a receptionist.
Health questions were always searched; they are now increasingly answered without a click. Where a practice has published nothing specific, the answer is assembled from general health content and whatever third-party directories say — including waiting times and coverage details that were never checked with you.
- Coverage, referral rules and waiting times are practice-specific and change often
- Answers marked up per question are what these systems can quote precisely
- Publishing yours is the only way to have a say in what gets said about you
Rules that change at every border
Reimbursement, licensing, referral routes and what a professional may say in public all change from one European country to the next. That is precisely why generic content fails here: an answer that is correct in one system is misleading in the next, and a machine summarising it will drop the qualification first.
- Attach the country and the system to every statement about cost, cover or eligibility
- Publish in the language the patient or professional asks in, not only in English
- Say plainly what is regulated advice and what is general information, in the text and not only in a disclaimer
- Keep a revision date visible, because a rule that changed last quarter makes the page wrong rather than old
The five answers a practice should publish first
Reception answers all five dozens of times a week. Publishing them is both a visibility exercise and a workload one.
Why clinics and practices start with AnswerLink
Patients ask an assistant before they call reception, and where a practice has published nothing, the answer comes from general health content and third-party directories — including details about your practice nobody checked with you. AnswerLink publishes your own answers with a gate a clinic can live with: nothing goes out that a person at your practice has not confirmed, and every sentence shows the record behind it.
- Coverage, referral rules and waiting times published by you, dated, current
- An unsourced sentence blocks publishing — the gate is the feature
- Reception answers the same questions dozens of times a week; publish them once
A sentence with nothing behind it does not go out
Every factual sentence traces to a record somebody at your practice confirmed. An unsourced sentence blocks publishing rather than shipping with a warning — which is the mechanism that makes this usable in a regulated setting at all.
Read moreIt will not improvise about care
The agent can only draw on what you have published and confirmed. A question outside that gets an honest redirect to a person — which is the correct clinical answer as well as the correct product behaviour.
Read moreOne page per question, in plain language
Structured so an engine can quote it whole and a worried person can read it in thirty seconds — on your own domain, so the answer that surfaces is attributable to your practice.
Read moreWhat clinics, practices and healthcare providers ask us
Can we be sure it never publishes something clinically wrong?
No software can promise that, and one that did would be lying to you. What this does is narrower and checkable: nothing publishes that a person at your practice has not confirmed, every sentence shows the record behind it, and the agent cannot answer beyond what was published. The clinical judgement stays with clinicians; the product's job is to make sure nothing bypasses them.
Does it handle patient data?
It should never see any. The Company Brain is built from what your practice knows and publishes — treatments, procedures, coverage, qualifications, waiting times — not from patient records. Nothing here needs a single identifiable patient to work.
Our clinicians are cautious about publishing. Is that a problem?
It is the right instinct, and the workflow is built around it. Records arrive proposed rather than true, a named person confirms each one, and the sourcing on every published sentence is what lets a cautious reviewer approve in minutes instead of rewriting from scratch.
See what your own company already knows.
The scan is free and takes about four minutes. What comes back is your company, structured — not a demo of someone else’s.
Scan my website